110 Hebron Way/15 Verafin Way

Share 110 Hebron Way/15 Verafin Way on Facebook Share 110 Hebron Way/15 Verafin Way on Twitter Share 110 Hebron Way/15 Verafin Way on Linkedin Email 110 Hebron Way/15 Verafin Way link

Consultation has concluded

The City received an application from 55732 NL Inc. (KMK Capital Inc.) to develop a pedway (enclosed pedestrian connection) between an existing building located at 110 Hebron Way and a new proposed building located at 15 Verafin Way. The Development Regulations do not allow buildngs to cross over property boundaries. This does not permit a development to extend beyond the side yard or cross a property boundary. It is recommended to amend the Development Regulations to allow consideration of pedways - a sheltered pedestrian connection that could cross property boundaries, streets, or rights of way.

Along with the amendment, the City is advertising the Discretionary Use of an enclosed Pedway at grade. The Pedway will extend between a building at 110 Hebron Way and a building at 15 Verafin Way.

Review the materials on this page and provide your feedback or ask a question.

Return to Planning St. John's main page

The City received an application from 55732 NL Inc. (KMK Capital Inc.) to develop a pedway (enclosed pedestrian connection) between an existing building located at 110 Hebron Way and a new proposed building located at 15 Verafin Way. The Development Regulations do not allow buildngs to cross over property boundaries. This does not permit a development to extend beyond the side yard or cross a property boundary. It is recommended to amend the Development Regulations to allow consideration of pedways - a sheltered pedestrian connection that could cross property boundaries, streets, or rights of way.

Along with the amendment, the City is advertising the Discretionary Use of an enclosed Pedway at grade. The Pedway will extend between a building at 110 Hebron Way and a building at 15 Verafin Way.

Review the materials on this page and provide your feedback or ask a question.

Return to Planning St. John's main page

Consultation has concluded

Please use this space to ask questions regarding this application and we will provide an answer. All questions will be posted as submitted. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response. 

The Q & A section will remain open while the application is active.  

If you prefer to provide comments or questions using mail or email, please do so to the Office of the City Clerk, including your name and address, e-mail cityclerk@stjohns.ca or write to P.O. Box 908, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5M2. Be sure to include the name of the application in your submission.


  • Share It is not so much as my being opposed to a pedway - I am not opposed - as it is the idiotic and vague air photo that offers no useful information on specific location for said structure and not including some general info on appearances. A 12 inch - err 30 cm plank could be described as a pedway. Therefore, on principle - the "pig in a poke" concept - I cannot support such a loosely defined proposal. on Facebook Share It is not so much as my being opposed to a pedway - I am not opposed - as it is the idiotic and vague air photo that offers no useful information on specific location for said structure and not including some general info on appearances. A 12 inch - err 30 cm plank could be described as a pedway. Therefore, on principle - the "pig in a poke" concept - I cannot support such a loosely defined proposal. on Twitter Share It is not so much as my being opposed to a pedway - I am not opposed - as it is the idiotic and vague air photo that offers no useful information on specific location for said structure and not including some general info on appearances. A 12 inch - err 30 cm plank could be described as a pedway. Therefore, on principle - the "pig in a poke" concept - I cannot support such a loosely defined proposal. on Linkedin Email It is not so much as my being opposed to a pedway - I am not opposed - as it is the idiotic and vague air photo that offers no useful information on specific location for said structure and not including some general info on appearances. A 12 inch - err 30 cm plank could be described as a pedway. Therefore, on principle - the "pig in a poke" concept - I cannot support such a loosely defined proposal. link

    It is not so much as my being opposed to a pedway - I am not opposed - as it is the idiotic and vague air photo that offers no useful information on specific location for said structure and not including some general info on appearances. A 12 inch - err 30 cm plank could be described as a pedway. Therefore, on principle - the "pig in a poke" concept - I cannot support such a loosely defined proposal.

    etburden asked almost 3 years ago

    Thank you for your input. The proposed pedway can be viewed on this site plan. The pedway will connect Building A at 110 Hebron Way with the proposed parking garage and Building B at 15 Verafin Way. Following public consultation, staff will draft regulations for pedways and bring them back to Council for their consideration.